AAPL, Apple General Gounsel Bruce Sewell Named in ANOTHER Rico Complaint. AAPL, Apple Investors, APPLE Shareholders have a HUGE Liability Regarding the iViewit Stolen Video Technology and Bruce Sewell. Read ALL the Details and Documents as AAPL Shareholders are at Risk.

Apple General Gounsel Bruce Sewell was the General Counsel at Intel, INTC. Check out NEW RICO Filed Naming Bruce Sewell.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/147018909/District%20of%20Nevada%202:13-cv-00297-JCM-NJK%20Civil%20RICO%20Complaint,%20COX%20vs.%20Randazza.%20Racketeer/Corrupt%20Organization%20Jurisdiction:%20Diversity%20Case

Also check out Letter of Liability to Intel Shareholders Regarding Bruce Sewell, AAPL, APPLE Liability Letter Coming Soon.. 
http://www.douglasmelamed.com/2013/02/i-pro-se-counter-plaintiff-crystal-cox.html

"Apple Investors Endorse Directors, Executives"

"CUPERTINO, Calif.—Apple Inc. AAPL -0.98% shareholders Wednesday strongly endorsed the company's board and management despite a recent flare-up and pair of lawsuits over its cash hoard.

At Apple's annual shareholder meeting held in its headquarters here, the company said preliminary votes showed strong support for the company's directors, with Chief Executive Tim Cook receiving support from more than 90% of votes tallied before the meeting.

Shareholders also voted in favor of the company's proposed appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as its independent auditor, as well as an advisory vote on executive's compensation. Shareholders voted down two shareholder proposals however, which attempted to direct how much stock the company's leadership must retain, and another proposal to create a director-level committee on human rights. Apple's directors opposed both proposals as well.

The shareholder meeting was rather tame compared with what it could have been. Last week, a U.S. District Judge sided with hedge-fund manager David Einhorn, who argued that the way Apple was bundling several shareholder proposals into one item was illegal. The argument was seen as a proxy by Mr. Einhorn, who used the attention of the fight as a pulpit to discuss his proposal for the company to distribute more of its $137 billion cash hoard through a set of preferred shares.

Ultimately, Apple withdrew the proposal, which if approved would have given shareholders the right to vote on issuing preferred shares. Currently, only Apple's board can issue such shares.

Apple General Gounsel Bruce Sewell said Wednesday it was "committed" to reviving the proposal that bundled several corporate governance measures. Mr. Einhorn sued Apple to block the vote because he believed it could hamper Apple from adopting his proposal for a new type of preferred dividend-yielding stock to return more cash to shareholders."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323478304578330281330865040.html

 Ian Sherr at ian.sherr@dowjones.com
and Jessica E. Lessin at jessica.lessin@wsj.com

Jerry Falwell LOSES, But Marc Randazza, First Amendment Guru LIES about Blogger Crystal Cox and Sole, Conflicted, WIPO Panelist Peter L. Michaelson GIVES him Domain Names he is NOT Legally Entitled To Own. Talk about Hypocrisy, Discrimination, Favoritism, oh and Whistleblowers Tell me that "they" have private meetings at Trademark Association Meetings. HAD no Trademark, Steals Domain Names. WIPO Aids and ABETS this THEFT then "Allows" Peter L. Michaelson to Defame Respondent Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein. This is UNLAWFUL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

Reverend Dr. Jerry Falwell and The Liberty Alliance v. Gary Cohn, -

Also Check Out the Following Links

http://www.francisgurry.com/2012/12/open-letter-to-wipo-director-francis.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5J6-27MsDs

http://peterlmichaelson.blogspot.com/2013/01/world-intellectual-property.html

Massively Fraudulent Defamatory WIPO Decision accusing Respondents of Crime they were not on Trial for nor Prosecuted Of.
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2012-1525

iViewit SEC Complaint, Many Counter Defendants / Co-Conspirators of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL are Named

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf

District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL; Nevada SLAPP Lawsuit, Nevada Retaliation Lawsuit, Chilling Effect Lawsuit, First Amendment Threat Lawsuit, Freedom of Expression Suppression Lawsuit. Transparency and Accountability DEMANDED in the Courts. Equality of Law and the First Amended DEMANDED.

        Judicial Rulings, Order by Judge Gloria Navarro


District of Nevada Docket Entry 14 Regarding TRO, Preliminary Injunction
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/146014867/District-of-Nevada-Docket-Entry-14-Regarding-TRO-Preliminary-Injunction

Docket Entry 41District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL Judge Gloria M. Navarro Ruling Granting Preliminary Injunction to Plaintiff.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/146013760/District-of-Nevada-Case-212-cv-02040-GMN-PAL-Judge-Gloria-M-Navarro-Ruling-Granting-Preliminary-Injunction-to-Plaintiff

District of Nevada Docket Entry 76 Deny Powers to Order Investigation of Plaintiff
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/146014868/District-of-Nevada-Docket-Entry-Deny-Powers-to-Order-Investigation-of-Plaintiff

For More information regarding Nevada SLAPP Suit, Chilling Effect Lawsuit, First Amendment Suppression Lawsuit, Freedom of Expression Suppression Lawsuit, Click Below

http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/02/crystal-l-cox-nevada-lawsuit-crystal.html

                     District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL Docket Entries
                                         Where Judge Gloria Navarro Made a RULING.

Docket Entry 11

ORDER Granting 9 Motion for CM/ECF Access. Ms. Cox must provide certification that she has completed the CM/ECF Tutorial on or before 1/11/13. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/11/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) (Entered: 12/12/2012)

Docket Entry 14

ORDER Granting 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Motion Hearing set for 1/7/2013 03:00 PM in LV Courtroom 7D before Judge Gloria M. Navarro re 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 12/28/2012. Replies due by 1/4/2013. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/14/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) (Entered: 12/17/2012)

Docket Entry 27

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro, on 1/4/2013. denying 22 Motion to Request This Court Investigate Plaintiff Marc Randazza. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) (Entered: 01/04/2013)

Docket Entry 35

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Motion Hearing held on 1/7/2013 before Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Crtrm Administrator: Michael Zadina; Pla Counsel: Ronald Green; Def Counsel: None present; Court Reporter/FTR #: Araceli Bareng; Time of Hearing: 3:49-4:09 a.m.; Courtroom: 7D;

The Court makes preliminary remarks and hears representations from Mr. Green regarding the 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. IT IS ORDERED that 19 Motion for Judges and Clerks to Sign a Conflict of Interest Disclosure is DENIED; 20 Motion Requesting the Recusal, Removal of District Judge is DENIED; 31 Motion to Strike Defendant Cox's Reply to Response is DENIED; and 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. Mr. Green shall file a proposed order consistent with the Court's ruling.
(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MJZ) (Entered: 01/08/2013)

Docket Entry 36

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro, on 1/8/2013. By Deputy Clerk: Michael Zadina.

This case has been assigned to the Honorable Gloria M. Navarro. Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: www.nvd.uscourts.gov
(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MJZ) (Entered: 01/08/2013)

Docket Entry 40

ORDER that 16 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/9/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) (Entered: 01/11/2013)

Docket Entry 41

ORDER that 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. (See Order for details). FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall receive a $600 refund from the Court for the six domain names that were transferred pursuant to the WIPO arbitration decision. The Court shall keep the nominal bond of one hundred dollars ($100) for each of the other twenty-six domain names at issue because the evidence indicates that Defendant will suffer only minimal, if any, damage by the issuance of this preliminary injunction. FURTHER ORDERED that 19 MOTION for Judges and Clerks to Sign a Conflict of Interest Disclosure is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 20 MOTION for Judge Gloria Navarro to Recuse Herself is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 31 Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Defendant Crystal Coxs Fugitive Surreply to Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/11/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF: cc Finance - MMM) (Entered: 01/11/2013)

Docket Entry 76

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to 75 MOTION for Summary Judgment: Opposition due twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due fourteen (14) days after the filing of the opposition. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ) (Entered: 02/12/2013)

Posted here by 

Pro Se Defendant / Pro Se Counter Plaintiff

Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox

SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

Crystal@CrystalCox.com 

iViewit Technology News: "NY Governor Andrew Cuomo Asked to Shut Down Judicial "Ethics" Office" "New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo has been formally requested to immediately shut down the offices of The Commission on Judicial Conduct (the "CJC"

"Judges Were Illegally Wiretapped, Says Insider " & "Governor Andrew Cuomo
Asked to Shut Down Judicial 'Ethics' Office."  Excerpts Below of Third and
Fourth Articles in the Expose Corrupt Courts Series. To contact Iviewit
Inventor Eliot Bernstein for media interviews, please call (561) 886-7628.

For the full stories in the series click the following two links

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-breaking-news-judges-were-ill
egally-wiretapped-says-insider-governor-andrew-cuomo-asked-to-shut-down-judi
cial-ethics-office-is-it-1361010178.html

and

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com 

West Palm Beach -- Free-Press-Release.com-- Feb 16, 2013 -- Corruption at
the Highest Offices of the New York Courts Exposed and several Iviewit RICO
& ANTITRUST Defendants named in the unfolding scandal. Check out the first
five articles in a series that exposes the corruption that led to the
Wallstreet Meltdown and Exposes why no one, including the lawyers & judges
involved have gone to prison for these crimes. Wallstreet Whistleblower
former NY Supreme Court Attorney Christine C. Anderson exposes the Belly of
the Beast from the inside. Iviewit World Renowned Inventor Eliot Bernstein's
Car Bombed in Boynton Beach Florida, see images attached to this Press
Release, more information @ www.iviewit.tv .

Third Article in the Series "Judges Were Illegally Wiretapped, Says Insider"


WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2013
Judges Were Illegally Wiretapped, Says Insider

Not only were attorneys targeted for 24/7 wiretapping of their personal and
business phones, but judges in New York also became victims of the illegal
whims of political insiders, according to a former insider who says he
supervised parts of the operation for years.

It was previously reported that evidence was obtained on January 24, 2013
confirming illegal actions against New York attorneys, including the
continuous and illegal wiretapping of their phones and the complete capture
and copying of all internet ISP activity, including email. CLICK HERE TO SEE
BACKGROUND STORY "Former Insider Admits to Illegal Wiretaps for "Ethics
Bosses"

The Manhattan-based attorney ethics committee, the Departmental Disciplinary
Committee (the "DDC"), a state-run entity that oversees the "ethics" of
those who practice law in The Bronx and Manhattan, has been identified of
utilizing the illegal activity- at will, and by whim- to either target or
protect certain attorneys.

One Manhattan supervising ethics attorney, Naomi Goldstein, was identified
as a regular requestor of the illegal tape recordings, and former chief
counsel Thomas Cahill has been described in interviews as being "very
involved" to those who were conducting the illegal activity. Cahill
subsequently retired, however New York State-paid attorney Naomi Goldstein
still supervises "ethics" investigations from her Wall Street DDC 2nd floor
office at 61 Broadway.

Ethicsgate

According to the source, one New York "ethics" legend, Alan Friedberg, was
"very well known" to those conducting the illegal wiretapping activity.
Friedberg, who has become the poster child for unethical tactics while
conducting "ethics" inquiries, appears to have been present in the various
state offices where illegal wiretaps were utilized. Friedberg worked for the
New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct (the "CJC") before running the
Manhattan attorney "ethics" committee as chief counsel for a few years.
Friedberg then resurfaced at the CJC, where he remains today. The CJC
investigates ethics complaints of all judges in New York State.

Judges Deserve Justice Too, Unless Political Hacks Decide Otherwise

While court administrators have effectively disgraced most judges with
substandard compensation, it appears that at least the selective enforcement
of "ethics" rules, dirty tricks and retaliation were equally employed on
lawyers and judges alike.

According to the insider, targeted judges had their cellphones, homes and
court phones wiretapped- all without required court orders. In addition,
according to the source, certain courtrooms, chambers and robing rooms were
illegally bugged.

A quick review of notes from over one million pages of evidence, according
to the insider, reveals that the "black bag jobs" included: NYS Supreme
Court Judge, the Hon. Alice Schlesinger (Manhattan), Criminal Court Judge,
the Hon. Shari R. Michels (Brooklyn) and NYS Supreme Court Judge, the
Bernadette Bayne (Brooklyn).

More coming soon........ 
Full Article @
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2013/02/judges-were-illegally-wireta
pped-says.html 

Fourth Article in the Series "NY Governor Andrew Cuomo Asked to Shut Down
Judicial "Ethics" Office" 

"New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo has been formally requested to
immediately shut down the offices of The Commission on Judicial Conduct (the
"CJC"), the state agency charged with overseeing the ethics of all judges in
the Empire State. The request comes from a public integrity group after
confirmation that the CJC has been involved in illegally wiretapping and
other illegal "black bag operations" for years.

Governor Cuomo is asked to send New York State Troopers to close and secure
the state's three judicial ethics offices: the main office on the 12th floor
at 61 Broadway in Manhattan, the capital office in Albany at the Corning
Tower in the Empire State Plaza, and the northwest regional office at 400
Andrews Street in Rochester. 

The Governor is asked to telephone the Assistant United States Attorney who
is overseeing the millions of items of evidence, most of which that has been
secreted from the public- and the governor- by a federal court order. 

Governor Cuomo was provided with the direct telephone number of the involved
federal prosecutor, and simply requested to confirm that evidence exists
that certain state employees in New York's so-called judicial "ethics"
committee illegally wiretapped state judges. 

The request to the governor will be posted at www.ethicsgate.com later
today. (Media inquiries can be made to 202-374-3680.)

Posted by Corrupt Courts Administrator 
Full Article @
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2013/02/governor-andrew-cuomo-asked-
to-shut.html#more

Counter Plaintiff Crystal L. Cox's Motion for a Summary Judgement in Nevada Free Speech Threat, Chilling Effect, Nevada SLAPP Lawsuit, Nevada Vexatious Litigation, Constitutional Rights Threat, Prior Restraint, Nevada First Amendment Threat Lawsuit District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL.

Counter Plaintiff' Motion for Summary Judgement
District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL

Counter Plaintiff' Motion for Summary Judgement in Nevada Free Speech Threat, Nevada SLAPP Lawsuit, Nevada First Amendment Threat Lawsuit District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL

Memorandum to Counter Plaintiff' Motion for Summary Judgement
District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL

  Memorandum to Counter Plaintiff' Motion for Summary Judgement



For More Documents, Motions, Reply's, Prior Restraints, Lack of First Amendment Adjudication, Abuse of Power, Denial of Due Process in the Nevada Free Speech Threat, Chilling Effect, Nevada SLAPP Lawsuit, Nevada Vexatious Litigation, Constitutional Rights Threat, Prior Restraint, Nevada First Amendment Threat Lawsuit  named District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL, Please Click Below.

http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/02/crystal-l-cox-nevada-lawsuit-crystal.html


In the Name of Freedom of Expression and Free Speech, the Plaintiff and Co-Conspirators get my blogs and documents removed weekly, so if there is a document you want to see, and cannot, please eMail me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com or SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com or WhistleblowerMedia@Yahoo.com or ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com 

iViewit Technology Complaint List. Gregg Mashberg, Michael Real, Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Brian Utley, Raymond Hersh, Silicon Graphics, Lockheed Martin, Andrew Cuomo, Raymond Joao, Kenneth Rubenstein, Steven Krane, Thomas Cahill, Judith Kaye, Matthew Triggs, Jeffrey Sewell and More.

iViewit Technology Complaint Filing Directory. iViewit Technology Theft Complaint Filings


More on the iViewit Technology Story

http://www.eliotbernstein.com/

http://www.iviewit.tv/#Evidence

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

http://www.iviewit.tv/

http://www.josephleccese.com/

http://www.greggmashberg.com/

"Dear Inspector General" From Eliot Bernstein iViewit.

"From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein [mailto:iviewit@iviewit.tv] 

Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 6:43 PM
To: 'General, Inspector (OIG)'
Cc: The Honorable Glenn Fine - Inspector General Department of Justice, Lonnie Davis Miami Field Office; Lonnie Davis (Business Fax); Caroline Prochotska Rogers Esq.; Michele M. Mulrooney ~ Partner @ Venable LLP; Marc R. Garber Esq.; Marc R. Garber Esq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.; Marc R. Garber, Esquire @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.; Andrew Dietz @ Rock-It Cargo USA, Inc.; Frank Brady @ Expose Corrupt Courts; 'Christine C. Anderson'
Subject: RE: IVIEWIT BREAKING NEWS --- NY+Supreme+Court+Ethics+Department+Targeting+Whistleblowers in Eliot Bernstein RICO & ANTITRUST related lawsuit

Dear Inspector General,

In response to your letter below, please make this communique part of the ongoing investigation started under the Glenn Fine administration regarding the Iviewit and Eliot Bernstein case file that specifically deals with several instances of misconduct by employees of the US Department of Justice, as well as waste fraud and abuse affecting the DOJ.  In fact, we are waiting for responses from information sent in to the OIG offices regarding my ongoing RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit, which is legally related Whistleblower lawsuit filed by Christine C. Anderson, Esq., a New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Agency attorney, who claimed in sworn testimony in US Federal Court, before the honorable Shira A. Scheindlin that she witnessed attorney complaints against US Attorney’s whitewashed and document destruction and obstruction of justice for members of the USDOJ.  These felony crimes were alleged committed by senior ranking members of the New York Supreme Court, in conjunction with other agents of state and federal agencies to hide the complaints lodged against attorneys, a you scrub my back scenario amongst these corrupt government officials, including members of the DOJ.  Mr. Fine had referred me to Lonnie Davis of the Miami field office who has been working on these matters of National Importance for several years and has been given much evidence of the widespread corruption this case exposes.  Mr. Davis is also dealing with the fact that the DOJ, the FBI, the FBI OPR and the US Attorney Office in Miami will not speak with me regarding these matters and have referred me and all my matters to your offices as they involve a mass of corruption allegations against senior members of the DOJ dating back almost a decade. 

For your convenience in understanding these matters a bit better I am attaching herewith a link to a letter sent to President Barack Hussein Obama II and Attorney General Holder and others that will explain much of what this case is about.   http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTORNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf

The attached news article below from Expose Corrupt Courts blog directly relates to the New York Supreme Court targeting Whistleblower Anderson and violating virtually all of her (and another 125 victims) personal privacy rights to “Obstruct Justice” as claimed by the anonymous whistleblower responsible for the violations of civil rights.  This unidentified source has brought millions of documents now to the US Attorney and I, Eliot Bernstein, have been personally told by an insider that I am most definitely one of the “targets” whose rights have been wholly violated to stifle our evidence and cases and that we are in danger.  Since US Attorneys and FBI personnel have been accused by Anderson and also complained of in several of the legally related cases to Anderson by Judge Scheindlin, these matters can only be handled by your offices and we have sought action from the DOJ OIG for several years and we have not yet heard back and presume our cases are remain being investigated.  These claims of 24/7 unauthorized wiretaps and surveillance against victims of crimes of government agents exposed in the article below to silence whistleblowers and others with evidence against members of the DOJ and others, now demands urgent reply for our safety and privacy in our lives and also for the grave threat this criminal RICO activity inside government at the highest outposts of law and order represents to our great nation.  Please feel free to contact me for further information or evidence.  As I have been victimized by a car bombing in Florida, I find these matters to be life threatening. 

Yours truly,

Eliot I. Bernstein

Inventor

Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL

Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL (yes, two identically named)

Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL

Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL

Uviewit Holdings, Inc. - DL

Uview.com, Inc. – DL

Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL

Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL

I.C., Inc. – FL

Iviewit.com LLC – DL

Iviewit LLC – DL

Iviewit Corporation – FL

Iviewit, Inc. – FL

Iviewit, Inc. – DL

Iviewit Corporation"

Counter Defendants of Nevada Slapp Case, Free Speech Threat, District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL published defamatory statements with ‘actual malice,’ against counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, yet they have NO LIABILITY and are above the LAW. Counter Defendants of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL and Defendants of Rakofsky V. The Internet, Rule the Courts, Dominate the "legal blogsphere", and control the illusion of "Legal Commentary".

Counter Defendants and Alleged Co-Conspirators of District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL published defamatory statements with ‘actual malice,’ against counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, meaning they had knowledge that the statements they were posting were false and they went ahead with reckless disregard of whether they were false or not and posted these defamatory false statement.  Times v. Sullivan, Nov. 30 Op. at 5, 1 ER 39. 

Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox cannot recover damages without proof that Counter Defendant was negligent and Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox may not recover presumed damages absent of proof of actual malice as in Gertz, 418 U.S. at 347.” Id. at 9, 1 ER 43.

Clearly in District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL Counter Defendants had actual malice, they posted FALSE STATEMENTS knowing the information was false, and therefore cannot hide behind the skirt of Gertz, and Times V. Sullivan as a reason, adefense to have defamed me, Counter Plaintiff Crystal Cox, Deliberately and with Actual Malice. And somehow have no liability what so ever.

There is clear, blatant and OBVIOUS proof that Counter Defendants were seriously, deliberately, negligent, and had blatant, boldly lit, obvious, ACTUAL MALICE.

Why are These Attorneys Above the Law? Why do these NPR Reporters, Forbes Journalists, Fraud File Investigators, New York Times Journalists, and Law Firms get a Free Pass to defame and to violate the laws they are allegedly there to defend, to report on, to investigate? Why do the laws not apply to them? Is it because I am Pro Se? Is it because they own the courts, or have mafia ties and other massive money and power behind them?

Seriously, it is Obvious they Defamed me cruelly, maliciously and yet they have no liability, and on top of that SUE me, and those connected to me and get judgments, rulings, injunctions for whatever they want; with no due process or constitutional rights for me, WHY?

U.S. Patent And Trademark Office Knows of Massive Shareholder Fraud over the iViewit Technology Theft.

Visitor Analysis & System Spec
Referring URL:				(No referring link)
Host Name:													Browser:				IE 8.0
IP Address:				151.207.250.11 — [Label IP Address]									Operating System:				Win7
Location:				Alexandria, Virginia, United States									Resolution:				1067x600
Returning Visits:				0									Javascript:				Enabled
Visit Length:				Not Applicable									ISP:				U.s. Patent And Trademark Office

Navigation Path

Date	Time	WebPage
		(No referring link)
4 Feb	08:18:35	www.northwesternbusinessreview.com/2010/05/kenneth-rubenstein-corrupt-patent.html

U.S. Patent And Trademark Office Knows of Massive Shareholder Fraud over the iViewit Technology Theft.

Visitor Analysis & System Spec
Referring URL:				(No referring link)
Host Name:													Browser:				IE 8.0
IP Address:				151.207.250.11 — [Label IP Address]									Operating System:				Win7
Location:				Alexandria, Virginia, United States									Resolution:				1067x600
Returning Visits:				0									Javascript:				Enabled
Visit Length:				Not Applicable									ISP:				U.s. Patent And Trademark Office

Navigation Path

Date	Time	WebPage
		(No referring link)
4 Feb	08:18:35	www.northwesternbusinessreview.com/2010/05/kenneth-rubenstein-corrupt-patent.html